The French government is set to propose a new immigration law in 2025 as it seeks to tighten immigration controls, according to spokeswoman Maud Bregeon. This initiative reflects a rightward shift in French politics following the recent legislative elections, which resulted in a hung parliament.
Bregeon stated on BFMTV that there is a clear need for a new law, particularly in light of heightened public concern over immigration issues. The plan to enhance immigration policies comes after the tragic rape and murder of a Paris student in September, which intensified debates on migration, especially following the identification of a Moroccan suspect.
One of the key proposals under consideration is to extend the detention period for undocumented migrants deemed dangerous, potentially increasing the maximum detention time from 90 to 210 days. Currently, such extended detention is only applicable to cases involving terrorism.
“We don’t rule out the possibility of considering other provisions,” Bregeon added, emphasizing the need to prioritize the protection of French citizens.
Last December, France enacted an immigration law that was amended to gain support from far-right and right-wing lawmakers. However, many of these amendments were struck down by the Constitutional Council before the law was signed by President Emmanuel Macron. A government source indicated that the measures rejected by the council could serve as a foundation for the new immigration bill, with potential modifications and additions.
Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau, known for his hardline stance on immigration, has expressed his commitment to cracking down on illegal immigration. He has sparked controversy with remarks suggesting that the rule of law is not inviolable, and aims to reinstate the offense of illegal residence among other measures.
In contrast, Gabriel Attal, Barnier’s predecessor and current leader of Macron’s Renaissance party in parliament, noted that while a new immigration law is being discussed, it should not be viewed as an urgent priority. “Adopting a law for the sake of a law makes no sense,” he stated, emphasizing the need for effective state control over immigration rather than merely legislative action.
Written By; Christopher Emuakpeje